Creation Science Fair/Funny Scriptural Passages

TrebekCrow · Post by **TrebekCrow** » Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:56 pm

Creation Science Fair

This made me laugh for a sold ten minutes straight when I first saw it. It's like Landover Baptist, except it's real. That's right, these fanatics really do organize their own 'science fair'...really funny stuff.

Also:

"If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son...bring him unto the elders of his city...And all the men of the city shall stone him with stones that he may die:so shalt thou put evil away from among you..."

Deuteronomy 21:18-21

For those who haven't had 12 years at a Catholic school, this boils down to 'Stone disobedient childeren.'

Celexa · Post by **Celexa** » Mon Oct 27, 2003 6:26 pm

*starts sobbing A La Usagi* I don't wanna be killed to death by rocks! WAAAAAAAAA!

Lucied · Post by **Lucied** » Mon Oct 27, 2003 6:32 pm

There's one thing in the bible I'm glad society doesn't follow anymore

peachvampiress · Post by **peachvampiress** » Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:47 pm

And all the men of the city shall stone him with stones

Stone him with stones eh.....as opposed to leaves?

Post by **Tiff** » Tue Oct 28, 2003 10:20 pm

It however saddens me greatly that the proponents of Evolutionism have corrupted this true purpose of science and are instead using it as a propaganda tool to spread Secularism. But what is education for if not to fight against ignorance such as that?

............riiiightt. Teaching kids that there is evidence to prove that evolution MAY HAVE occured (Note that I didn't say it occured for sure..but there is evidence that it probably did.) is SO ignorant.

Jonathan Goode (grade 7) applied findings from many fields of science to support his conclusion that God designed women for homemaking: physics shows that women have a lower center of gravity than men, making them more suited to carrying groceries and laundry baskets; biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing; social sciences show that the wages for women workers are lower than for normal workers, meaning that they are unable to work as well and thus earn equal pay; and exegetics shows that God created Eve as a companion for Adam, not as a co-worker.

And thus, little Jonathan Goode will grow up to be one of those men who doesn't let his "woman" work, and expects her to pump out seven nice little baptist children even if it's against her wishes...wait, what am I saying? Women don't think for themselves.
And little Jonny shall grow up to the apple of his parents-*cough* I'm sorry..GOD'S eyes.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go be a proper woman and go have babies and carry groceries.

Celexa · Post by **Celexa** » Tue Oct 28, 2003 10:23 pm

Uh...Tiff...what? What does that have to do with stoning disobedient children?

::Edit::

I didn't see that it was a link, I"m not a person who mouses over text...gomen gomen...

Post by **Tiff** » Tue Oct 28, 2003 10:26 pm

Celexa wrote:Uh...Tiff...what? What does that have to do with stoning disobedient children?

click on the link in the first post, Celexa. that's what this entire topic is about.

Lucied · Post by **Lucied** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 12:36 am

Creation and science is almost an oxymoron...almost ^_~

Dinozore · Post by **Dinozore** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:29 am

biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing

Can't argue on this point...

Post by **Tiff** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:41 am

Dinozore wrote:
biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing
Can't argue on this point...

that's the one sentence in there that doesn't piss me off.

NameGoesHere · Post by **NameGoesHere** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:52 am

Ahhh, yes. How dare women do any kind of work other than child rearing and carrying groceries!? Damn those insolent women and their inferior biology! You should be making many children for your husband, cooking dinner and nothing else, you hear?! [/bullshit]

...When God returns to Earth she is going to be soooo pissed.

Akarui Kibuno · Post by **Akarui Kibuno** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:21 am

But look at this one too :

1st Place: "Life Doesn't Come From Non-Life"
Patricia Lewis (grade 8 ) did an experiment to see if life can evolve from non-life. Patricia placed all the non-living ingredients of life - carbon (a charcoal briquet), purified water, and assorted minerals (a multi-vitamin) - into a sealed glass jar. The jar was left undisturbed, being exposed only to sunlight, for three weeks. (Patricia also prayed to God not to do anything miraculous during the course of the experiment, so as not to disqualify the findings.) No life evolved. This shows that life cannot come from non-life through natural processes.

LOL! THREE WEEKS! Even a human takes nine months to be made! That it stupid. If evolution did happen (I kinda think it has happened somehow... because... we humans weren't always like that with clothes and things, were we ?) , it didn't happen in "three weeks".

It took us centuries to get to this technology and state of mind and everything... and they only wait for three weeks... when this is far more complicated than a man saying "Women aren't made for work" in 1900 and him saying "She can work, fine, but let me keep mine" in 2000 @_@

I know I'm not a scientist, but I'm interested in science enough to be pissed off by that. After having been pissed off by the paragraph about women, of course.

U_U

Post by **Tiff** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:38 am

I just wonder about two things.
1) I always heard that the reason women give birth is because it was part of Eve's punishment for getting them thrown out of paradise. Didn't God tell Eve that all women would suffer becuase of it?

So....isn't that kind of controversial to say that god already intended for them to pop out babies when they also say that god declared that punishment after she was thrown out?

2) Shouldn't these kids be praying for the souls of those who sin, peace and good health for mankind, and for their families instead of praying for God to help them prove a point in a science fair?

Akarui Kibuno · Post by **Akarui Kibuno** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:27 pm

Tiff wrote:So....isn't that kind of controversial to say that god already intended for them to pop out babies when they also say that god declared that punishment after she was thrown out?

Comme on, Tiffu-san

... It means that God was cruel to women in the first place and they don't even deserve his pity. So it means women are not worthy of anything if they were meant to suffer for eternity (I don't think the genetics will make men bear babies one day

... though my boyfriend loves the thought of it o.O)

Tiff wrote:2) Shouldn't these kids be praying for the souls of those who sin, peace and good health for mankind, and for their families instead of praying for God to help them prove a point in a science fair?

Buahahahaha...

(gee, how twisted am I today ?) Of course God was meant to do that! Don't you see? God punishes women by making them bear children... so he had to be nice to the children cause they weren't responsible

Dinozore · Post by **Dinozore** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:22 pm

Tiff wrote:I just wonder about two things.
1) I always heard that the reason women give birth is because it was part of Eve's punishment for getting them thrown out of paradise. Didn't God tell Eve that all women would suffer becuase of it?

I don't think giving birth itself was the punishment, I think the pain involved was...

ParaKiss_Groupie · Post by **ParaKiss_Groupie** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:13 pm

Dinozore wrote:
Tiff wrote:I just wonder about two things.
1) I always heard that the reason women give birth is because it was part of Eve's punishment for getting them thrown out of paradise. Didn't God tell Eve that all women would suffer becuase of it?
I don't think giving birth itself was the punishment, I think the pain involved was...

That's what I always thought, or at least was always told. But, here's the actual quote from the King James Version of the Bible: "Unto the woman he said, 'I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husban, and he shall rule over thee.'"

The phrase "in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children" leads me to believe that the pain of childbirth is Eve's punishment. BTW, the word "shall" is actually italized in my bible.

My problem with the experiment above: It's stupid! Charcoal is not just Carbon. There are traces of other elements! Plus, multi-vitamins? The products we use everyday are not the products found in nature. This is almost like that theory where they guy through a dirty shirt onto hay, saw a mouse crawl out, and so he assumed that dirt, cotton, and hay made mice. (We actually discussed that in Biology. It was a real theory!) Except this works in reverse.

Anthy · Post by **Anthy** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:51 pm

NameGoesHere wrote:Ahhh, yes. How dare women do any kind of work other than child rearing and carrying groceries!? Damn those insolent women and their inferior biology! You should be making many children for your husband, cooking dinner and nothing else, you hear?! [/bullshit]

...When God returns to Earth she is going to be soooo pissed.

That's right. We must give up all our individuality, hopes, thoughts, and asperations to carry laundry with our differently shaped hips. Creativity? Only if it's limited to making decorative cookies for the bake sale. We must lead pointless, frivolous lives devoid of personal growth or achievement dedicated to pleasing our families every little whim.

TrebekCrow · Post by **TrebekCrow** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:15 pm

1st Place: "Life Doesn't Come From Non-Life"
Patricia Lewis (grade 8 ) did an experiment to see if life can evolve from non-life. Patricia placed all the non-living ingredients of life - carbon (a charcoal briquet), purified water, and assorted minerals (a multi-vitamin) - into a sealed glass jar. The jar was left undisturbed, being exposed only to sunlight, for three weeks. (Patricia also prayed to God not to do anything miraculous during the course of the experiment, so as not to disqualify the findings.) No life evolved. This shows that life cannot come from non-life through natural processes.

Aside from the fact that this shows a complete ignorance of biochemistry, the logic is unbelievably flawed.

Using their reasoning, I can prove myself immortal.

I was alive three weeks ago, and I'm alive today. Therefore, I am immortal, Q.E.D.

"Rocks Can't Evolve, Where Did They Come From Mr. Darwin?" - Anna Reed (grade 6)

Since they obviously believe that genes exist, why would they think these geneles rocks could evolve?

Anthy · Post by **Anthy** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:37 pm

"Pokemon Prove Evolutionism Is False" - Paul Sanborn (grade 4)

I want to see exactly how the heck this project came into being. x_X

Dinozore · Post by **Dinozore** » Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:48 pm

Maybe it was along the lines of that "Pokemon is satanic" thing from a few years ago...